The Green Energy Corridor project cost is split into Rs 1,36,378 crore for intra-state transmission and Rs 50,000 crore for 50 GWh of battery storage.
The Centre’s Central Financial Assistance (CFA) covers Rs 54,082 crore, roughly 29 percent of the total project cost. There has been made no disclosure by the Cabinet about who will fund the remaining Rs 1,32,323 crore.
Reading the scheme’s structure, the balance must come from State Transmission Utilities (STUs), private transmission developers and storage investors.
The CFA itself has four parts:
Greenfield lines go to private developers through competitive bidding, who raise their own debt and equity.
Brownfield upgrades follow a cost-plus basis, which keeps the financing burden with STUs. Those utilities will have to borrow, contribute to equity, or find other funding routes.
Guidelines of the earlier phase acknowledge that states face financial constraints in building intra-state transmission.
Under cost-plus, the state electricity regulator sets the tariff from actual spending plus a regulated return on equity. Those charges feed into distribution companies’ power costs and eventually retail tariffs.
The government says the CFA will offset transmission charges and keep power costs down, but with the Centre covering about a third of transmission capex, two-thirds still must be recovered from users.
The impact will likely be uneven. Industrial and commercial consumers, who pay transmission and open-access charges, may feel increases first, while regulators tend to cushion households.
Against that, less curtailment and cheaper renewable supply could offset part of the cost. This is an analysis, not an official projection, and the net effect will depend on how well cost overruns are controlled.
Also Read: Commercial EV Charging Hub Installation Guide in India 2026
We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Read more...