Ajay Agarwal, Construction Claim Consultant at Agrasant Consulting, engages with Industry Outlook to discuss how Indian EPC companies are navigating growing project complexities through proactive strategies like early claim identification, risk mapping, digital tools, and effective subcontractor management to mitigate disputes and protect commercial positions. With 19 years of experience, Ajay has handled projects in more than 12 countries, working alongside prominent global infrastructure companies.
With increasing complexity in Indian EPC contracts, how are companies evolving early claim identification practices to minimize disputes and protect commercial interests from project inception?
The increasing complexity of Indian EPC contracts—often driven by aggressive timelines, fragmented scopes, and shifting regulatory landscapes—has prompted many companies to move towards early-stage claim risk mapping. Leading EPC players are now embedding contractual risk reviews, baseline programme validation, and early-warning systems during pre-construction phases. Dedicated claim cells or commercial risk teams are involved right from project kickoff to flag ambiguities, scope interfaces, and third-party dependencies. This proactive approach, when integrated with the project controls function, helps reduce disputes and strengthens commercial positioning from Day 1.
What specific contractual ambiguities or scope changes most frequently trigger claims in India’s EPC sector, and how does timely notification influence their resolution?
The most frequent claim triggers in Indian EPC contracts stem from:
Design approvals delays, Access or front availability issues, and Scope creep without change orders.
Ambiguities in interface responsibilities (civil vs MEP or owner-supplied equipment) further complicate the situation. These are often compounded by poorly defined notification protocols.
Timely claim notification—supported by contemporaneous records—significantly influences claim validity. Courts and arbitral tribunals increasingly look for compliance with notice periods under Clause 20.1 (FIDIC) or similar provisions. Delay in notifying not only weakens entitlement but risks contractual forfeiture of claims, which many employers are now enforcing more stringently.
How are leading Indian EPC contractors leveraging digital documentation tools or real-time data systems to proactively identify potential claims during project execution?
Forward-looking EPC contractors are adopting cloud-based document control systems, real-time site reporting apps, and integrated project management platforms (like Primavera P6, MS Project with ERP linkage) to capture deviation data live. Site diaries, delay registers, and inspection logs are increasingly digitized, enabling flagging of potential delays as they occur. AI-driven tools are also being piloted to scan email trails and meeting minutes for potential claim triggers. This digital transition ensures that claim preparation is no longer a reactive exercise but an ongoing, data-supported process.
In the face of rising subcontractor interfaces, how critical is early claim coordination across tiers, and what methods ensure notification alignment in multi-party EPC setups?
With increasing subcontractor involvement, early and tier-wise claim coordination is no longer optional. Disjointed notifications or missed back-to-back flowdowns can lead to the forfeiture of upstream entitlements. Leading contractors now ensure that subcontract agreements mirror the main contract's notification timelines and language. Weekly coordination meetings, centralized claim registers, and shared risk dashboards are used to synchronize notifications. Contractual provisions around "pass-through" claims and flow-down obligations are being drafted more precisely to ensure airtight alignment across tiers.
How do project owners and financiers in India perceive the risk of late claim notification, and what contractual penalties or consequences are becoming more common?
Owners and financiers now view late claim notification as a red flag, indicating either poor project controls or opportunistic posturing. As a result, contracts increasingly include strict notification timelines, with language that deems claims waived if not raised within stipulated periods. In some cases, employers are using this as a defensive mechanism to outright reject otherwise legitimate claims. Financiers, especially in funded projects, prefer clarity and consistency in claim handling to minimize downstream arbitration risks that could derail cash flows or project closeouts.
What future innovations—legal frameworks, AI-based tools, or contract automation—will most likely shape proactive claim identification and timely notification in Indian EPC projects?
Going forward, claim management will be transformed by AI-powered contract review tools, which will proactively flag risk clauses and notice requirements at the tender stage itself. Automated notification bots, integrated with site progress data, will generate draft notices based on triggers like delayed permits or variation orders. On the legal front, we can expect standardization of claim provisions in government contracts (through bodies like NITI Aayog) and digital dispute avoidance boards. This evolution will shift claims from being reactive documentation exercises to proactive contract compliance tools.
We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Read more...
